Summary
Sentiment is mixed; praised for helpfulness and SVS strategies, but criticized for toxicity, bullying, and poor leadership towards smaller alliances.
Overall Rating
Toxicity Level
Reviews
3 reviews
7/23/2025
We just faced off against state #2760, and I have to say, they were incredibly helpful! They gave us some great advice on setting up rules for SVS, and everyone followed them. It was awesome to see alliances trying out different tactics and even members switching alliances during the battle. They truly functioned as a united state. You can really tell they’ve been rotating their presidency, which is the key to managing large alliances effectively. Keep up the great work!
7/22/2025
Our first opponents for SVS. They were communicative and friendly. They leant their experience with SVS in other states to us, and negotiations for rules was positive. WC was lively during the battle phase and most of us have made a few new friends :) Can't speak for how things are in the state but as an SVS opponent they were all class and taught us a lot. Thanks 2760 <3
7/21/2025
This state is extremely toxic. Leader of main alliance making it hard for everyone in the state. Had so many great people transferring out and quitting the game. No castle rotations, doesn’t care about smaller alliances, toxic behaviour towards other alliances in the state that is not no1, bullying of other people and other alliances, state tun by dictator of the main alliance there, severely toxic mean alliance that turns alliances against each other for their benefit, no transfer split between main alliances, if alliance doesn’t agree with main alliance in that state they are being bullied and are not allowed to participate in svs. Stay away. They don’t care about smaller alliances free to play players. Only care about the one alliance and everyone else have to suffer.